Position

from the questions of internal review of the Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security"

 

The procedure of the reviewing of publications

Papers received by the editors of the Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security"  undergo procedure of the internal review by the Expert Commission from the questions of internal review of Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security".

 

1.Review should cover the following issues:

• whether the content of the articles stated to the title of the topic;

• how the article meets modern scientific and theoretical thoughts;

• whether the article is available to readers on which it is calculated in terms of language, style, material location, visibility tables, charts, drawings, etc.

• is it appropriate publishing of article with the accounting of the  previously released from thi question literature:

• in what exactly are the positive aspects and drawbacks of the article, what corrections and additions must be made by the author;

• conclusion about the possibility of publishing of these manuscripts in the collection, "recommended," "recommended with the accounting of corrections depicted by the reviewer" or "not recommended."

Article that is not recommended for publication by the reviewer, to the reconsideration is not accepted.

Positive reviews are not sufficient grounds for publishing of the articles.

2. Sent articles are considered Expert Commission from the questions of internal review Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security" for a month.

3. Expert Commission from the questions of internal review of Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security" is legitimate to send article for review.

4. Expert Commission from the questions of internal review of Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security" is legitimate to exercise scientific and literary editing of materials submitted, if necessary, cut them in agreement with the author, or if the subject of the article is of interest to the collection, send an article for revision to the author.

5. Expert Commission from the questions of internal review Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security" reserves the right to reject an article that does not meet the specified requirements or subjects of the collection.

 

Position

from the questions of external review of the Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security"

 

The procedure of the reviewing of publications

Papers received by the editors of the Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security"  undergo procedure of the external review by the Expert Commission from the questions of external review of Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security".

 

1. Review should cover the following issues:

• whether the content of the articles stated to the title of the topic;

• how the article meets modern scientific and theoretical thoughts;

• whether the article is available to readers on which it is calculated in terms of language, style, material location, visibility tables, charts, drawings, etc.

• is it appropriate publishing of article with the accounting of the  previously released from thi question literature:

• in what exactly are the positive aspects and drawbacks of the article, what corrections and additions must be made by the author;

• conclusion about the possibility of publishing of these manuscripts in the collection, "recommended," "recommended with the accounting of corrections depicted by the reviewer" or "not recommended."

Article that is not recommended for publication by the reviewer, to the reconsideration is not accepted.

Positive reviews are not sufficient grounds for publishing of the articles.

2. Sent articles are considered Expert Commission from the questions of external review Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security" for a month.

3. Expert Commission from the questions of external review of Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security" is legitimate to send article for review.

4. Expert Commission from the questions of external review of Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security" is legitimate to exercise scientific and literary editing of materials submitted, if necessary, cut them in agreement with the author, or if the subject of the article is of interest to the collection, send an article for revision to the author.

5. Expert Commission from the questions of external review Electronic Scientific Journal  "Public Administration and National Security" reserves the right to reject an article that does not meet the specified requirements or subjects of the collection.